Good title. Best thread. I'm Eldless, I play a purple birdperson. Her name is Itotia Ihuicatl, it means Dancer Sky in Nahuatl (because I am a creative mastermind). Say hello and post .gifs while I wait for the server to restart and whitelist me.
Thanks much, also, I dig the artwork. I might end up commissioning something from Jay, the shadow work and the expressions are to die for.
dude what the fuck did you say about my legs? they're NICE? my legs are the best motherfucking legs in the universe they're better than kanye west's view of kim kardashian who i may add, is a fucking hobbit. and you call them NICE who the fuck do you think you are i will stab you motherfucker i will stab you.
I dunno man, you say you like legs. Talk a big game and everything But I'm seeing a lot of foot and ankle in those pics. And I'm sitting here thinking, you know, maybe this guy ain't one of us. Maybe this guy thinks he's some kinda revolutionary But he's not He's just a leg poser.
you wanna go kid you and me right now i'll show you who's top dog i am a revolutionary for those with leg fetishes it's just people don't realize that foot and ankle are very very unattractive but i am an artist and i will fap to all the legs no matter how much ankle and foot is there you think you can just tell me that i am some fuckin notleglover on my fuckin forum dude i will wreck you your anus is NOT prepared for the storm okay? fuckin wanker butthole poopface you suck butts try'na say im a fake person
You're not a true blooded leg lover You're just an ingrate, poluting our long established fetish pool With your filth You might have all these normies fooled "Oh yeah, Narfball, he loves legs" But we can smell our own and you smell like Feet and ankles Your pics are, in fact, mostly feet and ankles If you're going to pretend to be one of us At least you could present yourself as a connoisseur And not some plebian foot fetishest
I honestly disapprove of your theory, allow me to pick at it graciously. "Oh yeah, Narfball, he loves legs" Is the foot and ankle not part of the leg, you UNEDUCATED worm? You think the leg is just a shin, kneecap and thigh, do you not? Well, I have news, fellow leg enthusiast. The leg is also foot and ankle. But we can smell our own and you smell like Feet and ankles Then how did you misjudge me so harshly? Because you truly are NOT one of us. Your pics are, in fact, mostly feet and ankles If you're going to pretend to be one of us That is where you are wrong. I do not pretend, I am a man of truth. My pics are in fact, not, mostly feet and ankles. I point you at all of them. There is more shin and thigh there than anything else. You moronic whelp, you're now being put on the chopping block. Defend your points, or be slaughtered by my MIGHTY BUTTSWORD.
"I honestly disapprove of your theory, allow me to pick at it graciously." Please do. "Is the foot and ankle not part of the leg, you UNEDUCATED worm? You think the leg is just a shin, kneecap and thigh, do you not? Well, I have news, fellow leg enthusiast. The leg is also foot and ankle." Ahem "In human anatomical terms, the leg is the part of the lower extremity that lies between the knee and the ankle," So, fellow uneducated worm, we are both in the wrong. Three out of four of your 'leg' pictures also contain feet, I assume you also enjoy feet, which is disgusting Because you pass off your repulsive fetish as 'leg love' When actually you love legs (Praise Be) and feet Also known as ground hands to the common man. "That is where you are wrong. I do not pretend, I am a man of truth. My pics are in fact, not, mostly feet and ankles. I point you at all of them. There is more shin and thigh there than anything else. You moronic whelp, you're now being put on the chopping block. Defend your points, or be slaughtered by my MIGHTY BUTTSWORD." I will be referring to the pictures numbered 1-4 1. A celestial leg covered in skin trees. Lovely. Despite the super deformed anatomy the shading is satisfactory and sends pleasure tingles through my kneecaps. However, it is sullied by the nauseating inclusion of a large foot in the center of the picture. The center of the picture is the most important part of the picture and there is a foot there as the focal point of this "leg" picture. This picture is regarded as a foot picture, regardless of what you say. 2. A crude cave drawing of a 'leg' which has little to no anatomy defining it's legglyness. Once again a foot is the focal point in this sorry excuse of a picture. Even the 'my' (marking the ownership as yours Narfball) is written on the foot meaning that the foot is yours. Why would a leg enthusiast want a foot? Why would a leg enthusiast write that a foot is theirs? I propose that we would not. Also, the 'leg' as you call it appears to end at the shin, showing a disregard for the most holy of sections, the thigh. 3. The most sickening example of your incorrectness. Notice the detail on the foot, notice that it is crafted with the utmost love, and attention of the artist. Compare that to the 'leg' that is haphazardly drawn in the corner of the icon, the calf ending too early, the lack of shading. It is simply a limb a segway to the foot. Once again the foot is the focal point of the piece, the explosion lines extending around it showing importance. This picture represents you, Narfball. The text above calls out 'LEG' but the evidence shows nothing but toejam. 4. This is a piece of art. Beautiful, best leg, 10/10 fantastic skin lawn and calf shape great thigh action true masterpiece.
While I understand your points and sympathize your stupidity, you are wrong. The foot is one of the finer details of the leg, yet you do not understand. You refer to the foot as a ground hand, which is not okay. Without the foot, the leg would be but a nub. You can't walk with nubs. The foot is an unsung hero, and you disgrace it by calling it a GROUND HAND. You truly are brazen, leg enthusiast. But let me direct you.. To the chart. View attachment 1331 Notice how pirates have declined with the global average temperature (GAT), this is directly related to the decrease in legs as well. Legs are becoming extinct due to the increasing GAT. You're disgracing an endangered species, the foot, and the leg, by calling them unattractive groundhands. Now I will direct you to the other things that are just as important. View attachment 1332 This, is not a ground hand. It has no thumbs. Yet you explicitly call it: "ground hands to the common man." What kind of argument is this, might I add? It's a poor one. It serves no purpose. You have to cover the facts when arguing, the leg is the best part of the body, foot included, and you fail to realize this. Why do you resume arguing with me when you know this argument will get you nowhere, as you are always wrong? "I will be referring to the pictures numbered 1-4 1. A celestial leg covered in skin trees. Lovely. Despite the super deformed anatomy the shading is satisfactory and sends pleasure tingles through my kneecaps. However, it is sullied by the nauseating inclusion of a large foot in the center of the picture. The center of the picture is the most important part of the picture and there is a foot there as the focal point of this "leg" picture. This picture is regarded as a foot picture, regardless of what you say. 2. A crude cave drawing of a 'leg' which has little to no anatomy defining it's legglyness. Once again a foot is the focal point in this sorry excuse of a picture. Even the 'my' (marking the ownership as yours Narfball) is written on the foot meaning that the foot is yours. Why would a leg enthusiast want a foot? Why would a leg enthusiast write that a foot is theirs? I propose that we would not. Also, the 'leg' as you call it appears to end at the shin, showing a disregard for the most holy of sections, the thigh. 3. The most sickening example of your incorrectness. Notice the detail on the foot, notice that it is crafted with the utmost love, and attention of the artist. Compare that to the 'leg' that is haphazardly drawn in the corner of the icon, the calf ending too early, the lack of shading. It is simply a limb a segway to the foot. Once again the foot is the focal point of the piece, the explosion lines extending around it showing importance. This picture represents you, Narfball. The text above calls out 'LEG' but the evidence shows nothing but toejam. 4. This is a piece of art. Beautiful, best leg, 10/10 fantastic skin lawn and calf shape great thigh action true masterpiece." 1. The first leg, is the best leg. It has a very strong foot, with graciously painted feathers on the shin and thigh. Truly a masterpiece that you spit on with no reason. And may I add, the foot is at the bottom of the picture? 2. This crude cave drawing was drawn by the magnificent TD, and you sully her name? You've truly outdone yourself, now you are arguing with two leg enthusiasts with the same beliefs. 3. I'm not even going to dignify this with a response, uncultured swine. 4. While it is a piece of art, it lacks the strong foot that keeps it standing. While the shrubbery is great, and the shin is gloriously painted, you do not realize that it lacks, the best part. The foot. It allows you to stand. Must I resume arguing with someone who clearly does not understand what they're getting into?
" you do not realize that it lacks, the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot. the best part. The foot." Ladies and gentlemen, this argument is over. He admits it. He is a foot lover.
That's all you can focus your argument on. Pitiful. And here I thought I was speaking with an intelligent human being who wouldn't affix themselves to five words. You are truly a disgrace to this community. Get off of my forum.
