Did you burn this to prove a point, like, hinting at burning Florans? Or did you vandalize it just to be an asshole?
Thank you for the feedback! Neither. Could you provide feedback or advice on the appearance on these photos?
So would you say that a slower spray of fire would be better? Reduced fuel, smaller nozzle, in order to increase the time in which the second photograph is the state of the object? Aesthetically pleasing, of course.
Just a passing thought. Does a baker cook things in order to make them more pleasing (aesthetically or otherwise)? Does a reaction using fire give life to that which is boring or blasé? I think the baker Conscium should answer my question. Please, if anyone can, ask her to answer here. It is a question of philosophy. Fire is becoming very interesting to me.
I like the third, it reminds me of the success of the 68th Floran Skirmish on the Frontier Colonies. - Chitlipotonqui Fenuku
Anyone who answers 1'st or 3'rd are obviously short sighted individuals who don't see beauty in the now.
It seems the second and third are most favorable, with a tossup between the two. Either way, fire decidedly adds a nice aesthetic aspect to an object. Especially if it is plantlike. I'll keep this in mind for the future. Thank you all. I may post further tests in a new thread at a later time.
I'm tempted. I jest, of course. This Hylotl is a very nice person, though it begs the question. Hypothetically, would this still benefit aesthetically with addition of #2-sort fire (fire being emitted)?
Despite the loveliness of fire, it should not be applied to sentient creatures against their will. -Estuanstruculenter
With that costume, it looks somewhat Floran, but you can't help the fact that it is indeed a Hylotl. 1/10. - Chitlipotonqui Fenuku
